Ward Chirchill Essay
WASHINGTON -- More than five years after the University of Colorado Board of Regents fired Ward Churchill, he has run out of courts in which to challenge the decision. He challenged his dismissal on a variety of grounds related to his First Amendment rights, and asked the Supreme Court to review the case after he lost appeals in Colorado's court system. The Colorado board fired Churchill after a faculty panel found that he committed repeated, intentional scholarly misconduct.
Supreme Court declined to hear his appeal and Churchill's lawyer acknowledged that this was "the end of the line." Churchill, who before being fired taught ethnic studies (with tenure) at the University of Colorado at Boulder, has for years been the subject of intense debate about issues that include academic freedom and academic integrity. Supreme Court, no reason was given for declining the case.
Churchill added, “ “If, on the other hand, the European trade community were to be permanently restricted to the six nations, the results might be worse than if nothing were done at all – worse for them as well as for us.
It would tend not to unite Europe but to divide it – and not only in the economic field.*” Churchill shouted this remark to the French leader, General Charles de Gaulle, in a raging row on the eve of the Normandy landings in 1944.
Disapproval over a country's foreign policy is never a green light to intentionally murder its people, and the fact that Churchill applauds the deaths of innocents because they were American is what is repellant about him and his essay.
That year, Churchill was scheduled to speak at Hamilton College.To cite a metaphor used in one of the faculty reports on Churchill: If a police officer doesn't like the bumper sticker on a driver's car and so stops the driver for speeding, is a ticket justified as long as the driver was really speeding?Faculty members who participated in the reviews of Churchill differed on the role of the bumper sticker, and whether he should be fired, but the panels all agreed that Churchill had been speeding -- multiple times.Churchill denied the misconduct, but much of his appeal focused not on the merits of the misconduct charges per se, but on whether the university's investigations into him were unconstitutionally influenced by a desire to punish his controversial political views.The issue was tricky for many academics who were involved in the case, who said that they knew Churchill's views were controversial and believed he had committed scholarly misconduct.Churchill wrote the first four sentences of the quote for America’s Saturday Evening Post published on 15 February 1930: I cannot find any record of Churchill exactly repeating these words again – but if anyone can offer me a later source, please do share with me so I can correct and update this article.Of course, it can be quite expected that Churchill’s view of the world – and Europe – would have changed from the 1930s to the post-World War situation of the 1950s.Indeed, the quote could accurately be called a ‘stitch up’. Well, you can easily check for yourself, by reading all that Churchill said to Parliament on by a look at Hansard for that day.It is true that in the early 1950s, Churchill did not envisage the UK being part of the sort-of “United States of Europe” that he had envisioned (although, I argue that Churchill changed his position later on in the 1950s and early 1960s, when it became clearer that the British Empire and Commonwealth were in decline).On , it’s true that Churchill did say: "Where do we stand?We are not members of the European Defence Community, nor do we intend to be merged in a Federal European system. This can be expressed by prepositions, by the preposition "with" but not "of"—we are with them, but not of them.