Thesis Statement For To Kill A Mockingbird Racism Essay On Juno Beach

However, the most focused on point of Tom’s life was not the only point in his life where racism has been shown towards him.

The Ewell’s are a major source of racism towards Tom.

The fictional town of Maycomb, Alabama during the Great Depression The most obvious form of discrimination in To Kill a Mockingbird is racism; however, there are other types of prejudice and discrimination that typify relationships among the novel’s characters.

Scout, for example, is ridiculed in "To Kill a Mockingbird" because she is a tomboy.

Thesis Statement For To Kill A Mockingbird Racism-64Thesis Statement For To Kill A Mockingbird Racism-29

It is truly a testament to the corruption of society when a person who has earned a bad reputation is held in higher esteem than a person who was born with it, as is the case with Bob Ewell and Tom Robinson.This was considered a felony by the inhabitants of Maycomb.He knew they would never be able to understand his choice, so he made it easier for them by pretending to be the town drunk.This was unlike how African-Americans would act during this time-period.They would have a specific way of speaking without proper grammar.In everyday society, he is seen as just a low garbage man however, in church he is one of the most important figures as he is one of only four members of the church who can read. In the church, the method used for the hymns is the "repeat after me" method.Zeebo starts a line of the hymns and the line is the repeated by the rest of the church.Racism presents itself in many ways in the town of Maycomb.Some are blatant and open, but others are more insidious.A less easily discernible case is the persecution of Mr.Dolphus Raymond, who chose to live his life in close relation with the colored community.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “Thesis Statement For To Kill A Mockingbird Racism”

  1. Tyson explains that "...reader-response theorists share two beliefs: 1) that the role of the reader cannot be omitted from our understanding of literature and 2) that readers do not passively consume the meaning presented to them by an objective literary text; rather they actively make the meaning they find in literature" (154).