Terrorism Essay In English With Quotations New York University Admissions Essay
Who knows how its message would have been disambiguated?
Had the Gunpowder Plot been successful, a Catholic monarchy might have sponsored a complete re-write of its “founding violence” in the course of forming a state that would perhaps have been no worse than the Jacobean one.
One of the tactics of this demand is to invoke the dogma of moral equivalence: there is little if any difference between the terrorist and those he attacks.
If we regard a particular act of terrorism as something literally unspeakable, unthinkable, impossible to comprehend - as has been said of both the Gunpowder Plot and 9/11 Clearly an act of terrorism conducted by Protestant men, designed to intimidate Queen Mary herself and her Catholic supporters, the savage act of butchery was not (according to Appelbaum) without political meaning.
In George Buchanan’s The message was in essence that the Queen was guilty of both tyranny and nepotism, where she ought to have ruled under the law and with the consent of the nobility; and its intended audience included the Queen herself, her allies and the nation at large.
In both cases effect is neatly elided with cause, reprisal cited as originating violence. Terry Eagleton writes of “the ineradicable terror that lies at the heart of social existence”.
This ‘qualitative’ distinction between kinds of violence otherwise indistinguishable seems ‘natural’ only because we are ideologically trained not to think of state violence as violence at all.