Sample Of Research Papers Winter Break Essay
The analysis showed there were no significant differences between male and female coaches in overall leadership behaviors.
When the six leadership styles were examined separately, there was a significant difference in social support between males and females.
Once again, a better analysis method could have been chosen based on the nature of the data collected. The ecological generaliziability for the study is fairly high.
The surveys were mailed out, and returned on a volunteer basis.
The sample number for junior high coaches, in particular, is rather low.
That's why you'll see some fairly complex explanations in this paper on the data analysis but no information on the literature review. Within the sample, 118 (0.73) of the coaches were male, while 44 (0.27) were female.This paper would have been even better if the student had added a sentence or two about the results of the study.That way, after reading the first paragraph, the reader would know the purpose, hypotheses, and findings.There were significant differences between the three levels.When breaking down the six behaviors and examining them individually, an ANOVA was used to analyze the data.The scale uses 60 statements, which were preceded by In coaching, I: A Likert scale was then given for each statement: 1 = never; 2 = seldom; 3 = occasionally; 4 = often; and 5 = always. Scales were administered in a number of environmental settings: classrooms, gymnasiums, practice fields, and offices.The internal consistency for each section was calculated: 0.84 for training and instruction; 0.66 for democratic; 0.70 for autocratic; 0.52 for social support; 0.78 for positive feedback; and 0.69 for situational consideration.In general, females scored much higher than did the male coaches.A MANOVA was also used to examine the data for differences between the three levels of coaching (junior high, high school, and college) with regard to leadership behavior in general.There are a number of other factors that could effect the internal validity of the study, yet were not addressed by the researchers.Coaching experience would greatly effect the responses of the participants, yet this was not considered in the study.