Religion Good Or Bad Essay
The threshold for participating goes down to zero, which brings in more people.
And they tend to say incendiary things, which draw more and angrier counterarguments. There may be some things it's a net win to include in your identity. But arguably that is more of a placeholder than an actual label—like putting NMI on a form that asks for your middle initial—because it doesn't commit you to believing anything in particular.
I think what religion and politics have in common is that they become part of people's identity, and people can never have a fruitful argument about something that's part of their identity. Which topics engage people's identity depends on the people, not the topic.The church I grew up in was so big we called it the Repentagon.It was not a single structure but a thirty-four-million-dollar campus, built in the nineteen-eighties and spread across forty-two acres in a leafy, white neighborhood ten miles west of downtown Houston.The more labels you have for yourself, the dumber they make you.Notes When that happens, it tends to happen fast, like a core going critical.For example, a discussion about a battle that included citizens of one or more of the countries involved would probably degenerate into a political argument.But a discussion today about a battle that took place in the Bronze Age probably wouldn't. So it's not politics that's the source of the trouble, but identity.Most people reading this will already be fairly tolerant.But there is a step beyond thinking of yourself as x but tolerating y: not even to consider yourself an x.A scientist isn't committed to believing in natural selection in the same way a bibilical literalist is committed to rejecting it.All he's committed to is following the evidence wherever it leads.