Phd Dissertation Elt Research Papers On Arguements
Considering the impact of language proficiency and the cultural background of the writers on the types of citation practices they employed from the perspective of academic integrity, a cross-linguistic investigation of these practices is of significance.Hence, one of the aims of this study is to highlight the citation practices employed by English L1 writers and Turkish writers.This might confuse a lot of students who have no idea how to tackle Ph D papers due to their sheer size.However, there are a few helpful steps that they can adopt to make this issue simpler and the first step is to choose an effective thesis topic that will grab the attention of their readers. While the focus is on English NS compared to Turkish writers, the findings are likely to assist other writers from other language/cultural backgrounds in establishing a better understanding of the concept of academic integrity and the development of skills integral to the development of this understanding including citation practices.
In order to raise students’ awareness of academic integrity by teaching them the academic conventions of acknowledgement and citation styles in accordance with their academic disciplines, it is necessary to reveal the differences between citation practices employed by writers with English as L1 (native speakers of English) and those with English as L2 (non-native speakers of English).Novices employed citations less than experienced ones and preferred the citation function ), in a study on the rhetorical citation functions in low-rated and high-rated M. theses in gender studies, revealed that both types of theses used citatons but they were used for the knowledge display.Few attempts have been made to describe the source use of Turkish writers in English.This study investigates the types of citation transformation preferred by both English L1 (native language) writers and Turkish writers who use English as a foreign language (L2). Based on the relevant literature, a rubric was prepared by the researchers in order to analyse the theses by means of qualitative content analysis.The corpus consists of 34 theses, 17 of which are Turkish writers’ theses in English language including 10 M. and 7 Ph D theses and 17 English L1 writers’ theses comprised of 10 M. The findings revealed that three forms of content integration consisting of direct quotation, patchwriting and critical evaluation were markedly different in English L1 and Turkish writers’ theses.A lot of students prefer to pursue their higher learning degree in subjects like English language teaching due to the interesting topics covered in the course as well as their real-world applications.However, before a person can claim to be an expert on the subject, they must submit a thesis paper that tests their knowledge regarding what they have learnt over the duration of the course and how they are planning to implement the same in improving the scope of the topics.Therefore, aspects of citation practices and the skill of use of appropriate acknowledgement of others’ ideas and findings have a close relationship with academic integrity.Academic integrity refers to “the avoidance of intentional, unintentional and self-plagiarism via correct citation and referencing practices” (Marsh and Campion ), it is not easily understood by international students.The recent research on citation patterns indicated that citation use also shows variation across academic disciplines (Harwood ), in an interview study on citation functions used by sociologists and computer scientists, found that the former utilized citations for the reader engagement whereas the latter utilized them for signposting.Mansourizadeh and Ahmad (), in a case study, explored citation practices in research articles by non-native writers and native experts in chemical engineering with the same language background, novice writers were found to use citations less than expert ones.