Papers Quality Research
K., Italy, Spain, Israel, Poland, Serbia, Germany, Finland, Australia, China, India, et al.), biology, ecology The Water Funds Field Guide captures The Nature Conservancy (TNC) and partners recommended best practices process for scoping, designing, creating, and operating Water Funds as of 2018. more The Water Funds Field Guide captures The Nature Conservancy (TNC) and partners recommended best practices process for scoping, designing, creating, and operating Water Funds as of 2018.more Arsenic contamination of groundwater is a serious public health crisis that currently affects an estimated 140 million people in roughly 50 countries. Source waters can deliver reliable and high-quality water services for drinking and domestic use, livestock and ranching, irrigation, energy,... more Citation analysis of publications of Sergei A. Source Water Protection (SWP) has always been fundamental to water resources management.Applying the principles and solutions presented here, affected countries and their international partners can set realistic timelines for reduction and eradication of arsenic contamination of drinking water.
Acknowledgments Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, Bib Te X Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w15990 Published: C. "Match Quality, Worker Productivity, and Worker Mobility: Direct Evidence from Teachers," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. Bulletin on Retirement and Disability Bulletin on Health including Archive of Lists of Affiliates' Work in Medical and Other Journals with Pre-Publication Restrictions Archives of Bulletin on Aging and Health Digest — Non-technical summaries of 4-8 working papers per month Reporter — News about the Bureau and its activities.To find out how catchment attributes, such as land use, hydrologic soil groups, and lithology, can affect water quality variables (Ca(2 ), Mg(2 ), Na( ), Cl(-), HCO 3 (-) , p H, TDS, EC, SAR), a spatio-statistical approach was applied to 23 catchments in southern basins of the Caspian Sea.All input data layers (digital maps of land use, soil, and lithology) were prepared using geographic information system (GIS) and spatial analysis.Peer review by scientists in the same field as someone trying to publish research is supposed to help journals and their readers make sense of how credible and important the work is.Problems with peer review taint that process, and can extend the gamut from reviews that are carried out by someone affiliated with the researcher to entirely made-up reviews.I show that teacher effectiveness increases after a move to a different school, and I estimate teacher-school match effects using a mixed-effects estimator.Match quality "explains away" a quarter of, and has two-thirds the explanatory power of teacher quality.The breakdown by country below totals 502, reflecting papers counted twice because of corresponding authors with affiliations in multiple countries.While the blog’s co-founder Ivan Oransky notes that the list isn’t comprehensive, the blog does track scientific and medical publishing very closely, including with a researcher who “is constantly scanning those databases,” making the numbers a good indicator.Over the past five years, a total of 498 papers have been retracted over peer-review issues, according to the US blog Retraction Watch (papers can also be retracted for other reasons, but those papers aren’t included here).The blog used the nationalities of corresponding authors to reach its tally, since they are responsible for paper submissions.