Marxism Essay Thesis
Claims for one discipline are usually pressed against the perception of competing claims by a rival discipline.
My own relation to Marxism did not start from reading or joining a group where I would eventually run into someone who had. Controversy about why and how things happen does not go away, nor do the deep uncertainties about what history is, what Marxism is, and how well the two fit together.
As if to explain what philosophy can do that history can't, each chapter makes a proud display of anachronism.
Žižek's chapter lays out Marx’s opinion of the recent fashion for so-called object-oriented ontology, an eco-friendly branch of philosophy that wants to take human-centered arrogance down a notch—as in Graham Harman's (2012).
Žižek and company have in their sights a version of history that assumes that new concepts build and improve on those of the past.
Philosophy, like literary criticism, is allergic to progress. One basic premise of both disciplines is that the great works of the past speak unhindered to the present, bringing forward through time a wisdom that can never go out of date.