” The political movement that elected a president who wanted to ban immigration by adherents of an entire religion, who encourages police to brutalize suspects, and who has destroyed thousands of immigrant families for violations of the law less serious than those of which he and his coterie stand accused, now laments the state of due process. It reflects a clear principle: Only the president and his allies, his supporters, and their anointed are entitled to the rights and protections of the law, and if necessary, immunity from it.
The rest of us are entitled only to cruelty, by their whim.
As Lili Loofbourow wrote of the Kavanaugh incident in , adolescent male cruelty toward women is a bonding mechanism, a vehicle for intimacy through contempt.
The white men in the lynching photos are smiling not merely because of what they have done, but because they have done it together.
At a rally in Mississippi, a crowd of Trump supporters cheered as the president mocked Christine Blasey Ford, the psychology professor who has said that Brett Kavanaugh, whom Trump has nominated to a lifetime appointment on the Supreme Court, attempted to rape her when she was a teenager. “Indelible in the hippocampus is the laughter,” Ford said, referring to the part of the brain that processes emotion and memory, “the uproarious laughter between the two, and their having fun at my expense.” And then at Tuesday’s rally, the president made his supporters laugh at her.Further reading: The most striking thing about Trump’s mockery of Christine Blasey Ford Even those who believe that Ford fabricated her account, or was mistaken in its details, can see that the president’s mocking of her testimony renders all sexual-assault survivors collateral damage.Anyone afraid of coming forward, afraid that she would not be believed, can now look to the president to see her fears realized.We can hear the spectacle of cruel laughter throughout the Trump era.There were the border-patrol agents cracking up at the crying immigrant children separated from their families, and the Trump adviser who delighted white supremacists when he mocked a child with Down syndrome who was separated from her mother.The artifacts that persist in my memory, the way a bright flash does when you close your eyes, are the photographs of lynchings.But it’s not the burned, mutilated bodies that stick with me. There’s the photo of the lynching of Thomas Shipp and Abram Smith in Indiana in 1930, in which a white man can be seen grinning at the camera as he tenderly holds the hand of his wife or girlfriend.It is not just that the perpetrators of this cruelty enjoy it; it is that they enjoy it with one another.Their shared laughter at the suffering of others is an adhesive that binds them to one another, and to Trump.This volume contains a unique collection of essays on various aspects of current interest within the field of public international law, international criminal law, human rights and humanitarian law.The wide range and topicality of the issues covered bears witness to the vast professional experience of Antonio Cassese, the first President of the ICTY, in whose honour this collection has been compiled, and to the many fields of scholarship in which he has left a permanent mark.