Good And Evil Good And Bad Essay Nyu Mfa Thesis Exhibition
Natural evils are bad states of affairs which do not result from the intentions or negligence of moral agents.
This entry will focus on evil in this narrower sense.The entry will not discuss evil in the broad sense or the problem of evil to any significant degree (these topics will be discussed briefly only in section 2).The main issues discussed by philosophers on the topic of evil have been: Should we use the term ‘evil’ in our moral, political, and legal discourse and thinking, or is evil an out-dated or empty concept which should be abandoned?What is the relationship between evil and other moral concepts such as badness and wrongdoing?What are the necessary and sufficient conditions for evil action?Evil-skeptics give three main reasons to abandon the concept of evil: (1) the concept of evil involves unwarranted metaphysical commitments to dark spirits, the supernatural, or the devil; (2) the concept of evil is useless because it lacks explanatory power; and (3) the concept of evil can be harmful or dangerous when used in moral, political, and legal contexts, and so, it should not be used in those contexts, if at all.The concept of evil is often associated with supernatural powers or creatures, especially in fictional and religious contexts.The monsters of fictions, such as vampires, witches, and werewolves, are thought to be paradigms of evil.These creatures possess powers and abilities that defy scientific explanation, and perhaps human understanding.It seems that if the creator has these attributes, there would be no evil in the world. Thus, there is reason to believe that an all-powerful, all-knowing, all-good creator does not exist.In contrast to the broad concept of evil, the narrow concept of evil picks out only the most morally despicable sorts of actions, characters, events, etc. is the worst possible term of opprobrium imaginable” (Singer 2004, 185).