Example Of Conclusion In Research Paper

So, specify the shortcomings in the conclusion to make your paper more appealing for new researchers.They will surely attract to learn from your shortcomings in order to refine their methodology and findings.Specify the benefits of the research paper in concluding paragraph.While writing a conclusion for your research paper, it is also important to emphasize the shortcomings you have faced while going through your research. However, whatever the reasons might be, it is a fact that deficiencies always affect the results and findings.For example if you present the relationship between balanced diet and its relation to child’s health and speedy growth then you can suggest a plan for your readers that must ensure a child receive healthy food.When you write your conclusion, it shows that you are almost finished with your research.Drawing out the conclusion is the most important and crucial step while writing a research paper.

Tie the concluding remarks with the body of your paper.

Never try to incorporate new ideas and do not go for much detail while writing a conclusion.

Conclusion for a research paper should be catchy and strong enough so that it grabs the attention of the readers.

Remember; never introduce any new information in your conclusion.

It is a fact that writing a conclusion for a research paper is the most technical and original work you offer to your research.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “Example Of Conclusion In Research Paper”

  1. She also is a member of the Steering Committee for the University of North Carolina Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention and the School of Nursing’s Biobehavioral Laboratory Scientific Advisory Board.

  2. ) The journal version of a publication will be cited more than the conference version, because the journal version has a later date and thus seems more authoritative. journals, see the CRA Best Practices Memo, Evaluating Computer Scientists and Engineers For Promotion and Tenure and Bertrand Meyer et al.'s CACM article Research Evaluation for Computer Science.