Essay Against Random Drug Testing In Schools Act 3 Scene 1 Essay
The stated goal of such programs is to identify students with possible substance abuse issues and to intervene early. Drug tests are usually in the form of a urinalysis, which detects marijuana, cocaine, amphetamines, PCP and opioids.Schools do this because if they advise students' beforehand about a drug test date, casual drug users can plan accordingly by choosing to avoid drugs a few weeks leading up to the test, which means that schools cannot "catch" students that use drugs.On the other hand, random drug testing can be seen as unfair overall because the argument is that a student who may try a drug one time, shouldn't be penalized in such a harsh manner.For instance, they sense that the teacher is working while under the influence.However, this usually begins with a search and seizure.While safety is a legitimate concern, this has remained an area of disagreement and viewed as a “slippery slope,” especially when schools have taken the liberty of implementing school-wide testing. Some studies show that school districts that employ this strategy do not have lower reports of drug use and other studies find that there is a link between drug testing and reduced prevalence of drug use.
Rules can be anything from following a dress code, to walking in a line in the hallway to more strict matters, such as zero tolerance policies against alcohol and drug use.It's also considered by many a violation of the student's rights.Most teachers who apply to work in a school district will be required to get their fingerprints done and submit a criminal background check.Given the lack of scientific data supporting the effectiveness of drug testing, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has taken a strong position that student drug testing is not recommended. When students are in school, they need to follow certain rules.There have been no systematic studies examining the effectiveness of drug testing as it compares to other prevention strategies.As opponents of drug testing have pointed out, there are a large number of unintended consequences to drug testing and no study has taken this into account in weighing the harms and benefits of RSDT in schools.The fact of the matter is, even though the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution says that Americans have the right to privacy, both teachers and students essentially waive this right at school for a variety of different reasons.Yet some students may believe that since teachers are only subject to drug tests under reasonable suspicion, then the same standard should apply to students.The Supreme Court originally reasoned that athletes can be drug tested because they are role models and can influence the drug culture of a school, and that drug use and athletics are a dangerous combination.This same logic was extended to extra-curricular activities.