Essay Against Raising The Driving Age
The problem with this logic is that the main reason that this age group has the highest crash rate is that they are the least experienced.
If the driving age is raised, the only thing that will change is the age group of the inexperienced drivers.
Statistics show that young people age fifteen through twenty make up 6.7 percent of the total driving population in this country, but are involved in 14 percent of all fatal crashes (Memmer 1). There are plenty of consequences both positive and negative if the driving age is raised.Another question being asked is, "What is going to happen if the driving age is not raised? The first time behind the wheel alone--exciting, nerve-racking, free. The discussion of keeping the minimum driving age at 16 or raising it to 21 revolves around generic maturity, but there is more than just that to look at.The question about raising the minimum age for a driving license has been pushed to the headlines because of the growing amount of automobile accidents.Whether it would reduce or even prevent accidents of this sort or will simply do no good is the heart of this argument.When they gain their learners permits, most new drivers learn to drive from their parents.At 18, most teens will be going off to college, depriving them of the opportunity to learn motor skills from their parents.There are good reasons as to why the driving age should not be raised: it is inexperience not young age that causes crashes, parents of minors are allowed to deny their children licenses or permits, and raising the driving age would make it harder to get drivers proper training.It is true that the risk of crashing is higher for the 16-18 age group than any other.Instead, a good idea would be to increase the amount of time a teen needs a permit for, in order to get more experience before actually getting a license.Advocates of raising the driving age often cite immaturity as a reason that the 16-18 age group has so many crashes.