Action Divine Essay Human In Metaphysics Theism
To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Note you can select to send to either the @free.or @variations.Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.If, however, we believe something about God’s character, then we might find aspects of it which would motivate Him to choose one course of action over another.If God is a morally unsurpassable agent, then this sets a constraint on which might guide His actions: God will only act on good intentions (or reasons, or motivations, etc.); the better some intention relative to other good intentions, the more important a determining factor it will be for God when He is deciding how to act.This can all be construed as metaphorically or analogously as our accounts of the divine mind, divine goodness, or theological predication require, since the account of obligations I give in due course is intended to generalize between deontological, consequentialist and virtues-based accounts of ethics.We can divide a perfect being’s perfections into those which relate to His character, and those which relate to His capabilities.To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
I argue that this view achieves an ideal way of knowing, worthy of the divine being.
Then I show the usefulness of the procedure by describing how it can help structure discussions in natural theology and a-theology, and how it offers an attractive alternative to ‘skeptical theism’.
This article sets out a formal procedure for determining the probability that God would do a specified action, using a subset of the theologian’s beliefs I will refer to as ‘moral knowledge’: our beliefs about what is right for us to do, and our beliefs about the details of situations which bear on what we should do. To begin answering, I point out how predictions of divine action are central to natural theology, as well as relevant to other pieces of religious reasoning (Section ), I will give a better answer to another obvious criticism.
which operates in a probabilistic framework – arguing that some phenomena independent of revelation confirm, or disconfirm, God’s existence – thereby involves a great many claims about what God would There are arguments for and against God’s existence which are more forcefully presented if they describe their prediction of divine actions as ‘analytic truths’.
In these cases, probability only enters the picture when we’re considering whether the phenomena under consideration have really occurred.